<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands That Make You Scoff – FirstBank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebrandingblog.com/advertising/brands-scoff-firstbank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/advertising/brands-scoff-firstbank/</link>
	<description>information and strongly-held opinions concerning branding and positioning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/advertising/brands-scoff-firstbank/comment-page-1/#comment-35992</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/?p=306#comment-35992</guid>
		<description>Bah, whatever. The guy is hot in a creepy way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, whatever. The guy is hot in a creepy way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Jelsema</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/advertising/brands-scoff-firstbank/comment-page-1/#comment-35983</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Jelsema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/?p=306#comment-35983</guid>
		<description>Dom, yes, I agree about Quiznos.  They&#039;ve had more really bad ad concepts than any company I know. And their brand suffers.

For a while their idea of &quot;toasted&quot; as a differentiator was getting through to me, but now it&#039;s just another distracting campaign that buries the message in tastelesness (pardon the pun).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom, yes, I agree about Quiznos.  They&#8217;ve had more really bad ad concepts than any company I know. And their brand suffers.</p>
<p>For a while their idea of &#8220;toasted&#8221; as a differentiator was getting through to me, but now it&#8217;s just another distracting campaign that buries the message in tastelesness (pardon the pun).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/advertising/brands-scoff-firstbank/comment-page-1/#comment-35979</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/?p=306#comment-35979</guid>
		<description>Martin, speaking of brands that make you scoff - what about Quiznos!? Every time I think about Quiznos I always picture that rat/mouth character screaming out &quot;They Got A Pepper Bar!.&quot; Now, with their new &quot;put it in me, Steve&quot; commercial, I&#039;m stuck with the image of a sexual encounter between a male oven and a freaked out sandwich maker. I think this is another example of how agencies are sacrificing brand integrity for sensationalism. Well put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, speaking of brands that make you scoff &#8211; what about Quiznos!? Every time I think about Quiznos I always picture that rat/mouth character screaming out &#8220;They Got A Pepper Bar!.&#8221; Now, with their new &#8220;put it in me, Steve&#8221; commercial, I&#8217;m stuck with the image of a sexual encounter between a male oven and a freaked out sandwich maker. I think this is another example of how agencies are sacrificing brand integrity for sensationalism. Well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

