<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Borrowed Interest Ads Are a Waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/</link>
	<description>information and strongly-held opinions concerning branding and positioning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett Rossie</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-36519</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett Rossie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/#comment-36519</guid>
		<description>Martin, what bothers me most is when brands piggyback onto issues that are inappropriate by any measure: Kenneth Cole using the Egyptian protests to promote online sales. Groupon using China&#039;s suppression of Tibet to sell restaurant coupons. This is borrowed interest taken to a new low, and it stands out all the more in the age of interactive communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, what bothers me most is when brands piggyback onto issues that are inappropriate by any measure: Kenneth Cole using the Egyptian protests to promote online sales. Groupon using China&#8217;s suppression of Tibet to sell restaurant coupons. This is borrowed interest taken to a new low, and it stands out all the more in the age of interactive communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borrowed interest: Elvis Presley &#8211; Nat Whitten Continued</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-36255</link>
		<dc:creator>Borrowed interest: Elvis Presley &#8211; Nat Whitten Continued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/#comment-36255</guid>
		<description>[...] Elvis?  Why indeed.  Borrowing interest from a celebrity to gain attention for your product is frowned upon when creating communications, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elvis?  Why indeed.  Borrowing interest from a celebrity to gain attention for your product is frowned upon when creating communications, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BNET Intercom &#187; The Role of &#8220;Borrowed Interest&#8221; Advertising on BNET</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-9410</link>
		<dc:creator>BNET Intercom &#187; The Role of &#8220;Borrowed Interest&#8221; Advertising on BNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/branding/borrowed-interest-ads-are-a-waste/#comment-9410</guid>
		<description>[...] The borrowed interest tactic may seem clever, but some marketing mavens thinks it&#8217;s a recipe for mediocrity. When every other company is &#8220;borrowing&#8221; from the same interest in a particular event, how can you expect to differentiate your firm? That&#8217;s the point Martin Jelsema makes on The Branding Blog: [&#8230;] Borrowed interest just means thereâ€™s no real value in the product or service you offer, or at least the [advertising] agency people couldnâ€™t find it, or were more concerned with a â€œcreativeâ€ portfolio that might impress other ad people. But why on earth would the advertiser approve it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The borrowed interest tactic may seem clever, but some marketing mavens thinks it&#8217;s a recipe for mediocrity. When every other company is &#8220;borrowing&#8221; from the same interest in a particular event, how can you expect to differentiate your firm? That&#8217;s the point Martin Jelsema makes on The Branding Blog: [&#8230;] Borrowed interest just means thereâ€™s no real value in the product or service you offer, or at least the [advertising] agency people couldnâ€™t find it, or were more concerned with a â€œcreativeâ€ portfolio that might impress other ad people. But why on earth would the advertiser approve it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

