<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naming Tip 74 &#8211; Name for the Long Haul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebrandingblog.com/namecreation/naming-tip-74-long-haul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/namecreation/naming-tip-74-long-haul/</link>
	<description>information and strongly-held opinions concerning branding and positioning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Jelsema</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/namecreation/naming-tip-74-long-haul/comment-page-1/#comment-36262</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Jelsema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/?p=335#comment-36262</guid>
		<description>e:  I hope I didn&#039;t give you the impression that a company shouldn&#039;t focus. It should have a mission and a vision that is reflected in the brand, and especially as a start up, a this translates into a fairly narrow focus.

But over time circumstances change, new technologies develop, habits are discarded and new ones adopted. So  if you&#039;re starting out attempt to be a bit less product-specific and more want-fulfilling in your name, tagline and messaging. Don&#039;t tie yourself too closely to a solution that you can anticipate will become obsolete, but do be relevant to your vision and mission. Of course, we&#039;re talking here of a corporate brand. Product branding can and should be product-specific, and if the product becomes passe, your product&#039;s brand equity has become passe as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e:  I hope I didn&#8217;t give you the impression that a company shouldn&#8217;t focus. It should have a mission and a vision that is reflected in the brand, and especially as a start up, a this translates into a fairly narrow focus.</p>
<p>But over time circumstances change, new technologies develop, habits are discarded and new ones adopted. So  if you&#8217;re starting out attempt to be a bit less product-specific and more want-fulfilling in your name, tagline and messaging. Don&#8217;t tie yourself too closely to a solution that you can anticipate will become obsolete, but do be relevant to your vision and mission. Of course, we&#8217;re talking here of a corporate brand. Product branding can and should be product-specific, and if the product becomes passe, your product&#8217;s brand equity has become passe as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://thebrandingblog.com/namecreation/naming-tip-74-long-haul/comment-page-1/#comment-36261</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebrandingblog.com/?p=335#comment-36261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to the branding idea but most of what I had been hearing/reading was telling me to narrow my focus and/or product.
Your post  seems to support what I&#039;ve been thinking. That it&#039;s ok to have varied ideas and there is a way to brand that. 
That&#039;s good news for me and all my ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new to the branding idea but most of what I had been hearing/reading was telling me to narrow my focus and/or product.<br />
Your post  seems to support what I&#8217;ve been thinking. That it&#8217;s ok to have varied ideas and there is a way to brand that.<br />
That&#8217;s good news for me and all my ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

